Censorship in Computer Chess

For many months all chess fans and enthusiasts and advanced chess engine they hope the new version of Rybka chess engine, after announcing publicly that its interface chessOK have the right to update the long-awaited Rybka 3 Rybka 4, the author dissociates itself from the announcement of ChessOK, and currently there is no release date for the new version of chess engine going. There are certain flaws in the Rybka chess engine from the past and have not yet been resolved. Persistent Hash and the controversy that existed in the past with the chess engine Strelka. In May 2007, a new chess engine called Strelka appeared on the scene, claimed to be written by Yuri Osipov. Soon, there were allegations that Strelka was a clone of Rybka 1.0 beta, in the sense that it was a reverse-engineered and slightly modified version of Rybka.[39] Several players found Strelka to yield identical analysis to Rybka in a variety of different situations, even having the same bugs and weaknesses in some cases. Osipov, however, stated repeatedly on discussion boards that Strelka was based on Fruit, not Rybka, and that any similarities was either because Rybka also was based on Fruit, or because he had tuned the evaluation function to be as close to Rybka as possible.[40][41]

With the release of Strelka 2.0 beta, source code was included. Rajlich stated that the source made it "obvious" that Strelka 2.0 beta was indeed a Rybka 1.0 beta clone, although not without some improvements in certain areas. On basis of this, he claimed the source as his own and intended to re-release it under his own name,[42] although he later decided not to do so. He also made allegations that "Yuri Osipov" was a pen name. And today the apparition of the chess engine is named Ippolit has led the author going to say that this is a chess engine Rybka 1.0 clone, as in the past said on the same terms with the chess program Strelka. The chess engine IPPOLIT was released in October 2009 with its source code. Vasik Rajlich alluded that IPPOLIT may be a decompiled version of Rybka, and that the people involved kept him informed of their progress via email.[43] Since then several follow-up versions of IPPOLIT have been published, the last of those also support multiprocessing. Due to the possibility of plagiarism, neither Ippolit nor any of its derivatives (Firebird, Robbolito, Igorrit, Tankist) have been accepted into computer chess rating lists.[citation needed]. In this situation there appears to be presumed innocent until proven otherwise it'll, has demonized these chess engines and censorship show has brought back many malpractice chess servers employees committing all kinds of payment of crimes covered in the possibility of plagiarism of such engines. Its use has been prohibited, without which now has scientific evidence with a court ruling that affirms the plagiarism and infringement of copyright.Therefore this whole situation typical of a thriller screenplay makes me stick to Mr. Kevin Frayer in its proposal regarding this controversy and injustice in a sport science that is usually characterized by the nobility of its practitioners.

Comments from operators who decry the freedom of users on a chess server

 

"you are a "persona non grata" at the Playchess Engine Room so your recommendations mean absolutely nothing to me. Others should take note of this as well."

sign to Rob Osborne

engine room playchess, administrator

 

Jordi Ruiz